<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>beetlefeet.net &#187; abc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beetlefeet.net/tag/abc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beetlefeet.net</link>
	<description>Personal blog of Jack Casey.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hottest 100 of All Time? Hmmmmmm..</title>
		<link>http://www.beetlefeet.net/2009/06/08/hottest-100-of-all-time-hmmmmmm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.beetlefeet.net/2009/06/08/hottest-100-of-all-time-hmmmmmm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 16:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beetlefeet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 10 songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top 100 songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triplej]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beetlefeet.net/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m trying to figure out the top 10 songs I&#8217;d vote for HOTTEST 100 OF ALL TIME. For TripleJ ofc.
It&#8217;s hard to be properly objective at all when it&#8217;s all about nostalgia and personal memories. And when blogging etc it also becomes about your public image and what you want others to think about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m trying to figure out the top 10 songs I&#8217;d vote for HOTTEST 100 OF ALL TIME. For <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hottest100_alltime/voting/">TripleJ</a> ofc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to be properly objective at all when it&#8217;s all about nostalgia and personal memories. And when blogging etc it also becomes about your public image and what you want others to think about you. (&#8221;I&#8217;m so interesting, check out my taste in X!&#8221;&#8230;. But in all seriousness, check out my awesome list. Yeah!)</p>
<p>Anyway so far it&#8217;s something along the lines of (in no order):</p>
<ul>
<li>The Boxer (or A Hazy Shade of Winter) &#8211; Simon and Garfunkel</li>
<li>How Soon is Now? &#8211; The Smiths</li>
<li>Common People &#8211; Pulp</li>
<li>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry &#8211; The Cure</li>
<li>High and Dry (or Fake Plastic Trees) &#8211; Radiohead</li>
<li>Imagine &#8211; John Lennon</li>
<li>Voodoo People (strange outlier that won&#8217;t seem to fall off this list for some reason) &#8211; The Prodigy</li>
<li>Our House &#8211; Madness</li>
<li>Coffee and TV &#8211; Blur</li>
<li>Bittersweet Symphony &#8211; The Verve</li>
</ul>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting how one is compelled to include exactly 1 song from a band. If I can&#8217;t choose between High and Dry and Fake Plastic Trees is it likely one is in the top 10 and one is not? More likely they&#8217;re both nearby to each other and chances are I could have them both in my top 10, but that would seem wrong when real estate there is so scarce. It&#8217;s also interesting how bands I wish were in there and like more than bands that are just don&#8217;t have any mad stand out song that can stand it&#8217;s ground in so small a list. (Oasis, Flaming Lips&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beetlefeet.net/2009/06/08/hottest-100-of-all-time-hmmmmmm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
